Enter 'Quantum Leap' pun here
I have a feeling that will be the most overused phrase used in the media blitz for the next Bond movie, out Nov. 14.In anticipation of el Solace de Quantum, I've given Casino Royale another viewing. It holds up pretty well, long after that new-Bond-movie euphoria has passed. That, and my balls still hurt after the torture scene.
Funny how much of an uproar the casting of Daniel Craig caused.
posted by arthur @ 9:12 PM
5 Comments:
I cannot wait. I've watched Casino Royale at least twice, since the first time I saw the Quantum of Solace trailer. Love it. Love Craig, even though I did have reservations at first.
P.S. Have you seen any of the Brosnan ones lately? They do not hold up well, I don't think. Even Goldeneye, unfortunately, has dated badly.
that's a damn shame about goldeneye, i figured that's the only brosnan bond that would age well. But then again, i haven't seen it in a few years. Brosnan baaaaddd!
I hate you
roger moore's stuff has aged badly too. I can't take him seriously unless he's trying to do Bond girls like Holly Goodhead or Grace Jones.
Timothy Dalton on the other hand. Dude was too serious for his own good. Lucky for him dark serious brooding spy is what it's all about now.
Agreed.
Moore: sucks.
Brosnan: sucks.
Dalton: sucks. (Well, his two runs at it did, anyway. Not entirely his fault.)
Lazenby: sucks.
Connery and Craig? Awesome. (Except for Never Say Never Again, which should "never" have been made.)
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home